Childfree ease
*WORK IN PROGRESS*
Childfree ease
*WORK IN PROGRESS*
# Childfree ease
*WORK IN PROGRESS*
Space to breathe, name pressures, and celebrate non-parenting paths.
Gentle prompts for self-compassion, scripts to decline intrusive questions, and
links to community essays that normalize choosing a childfree life.
# Childfree ESH
- Always something you can do: Diet, sponsees necessary?
- Responsible: Impact on children around the world, %-part in shapings of fate
Disclaimer: If not desiring childfree living this'll be painful to read
- Parents bind themselves into harm to their offspring by ignoring this
- Close the door, to open others, get vasectomy, eases life and lets world settle around other pathways instead of "what if"
- Avoid 13th stepping into childfree living, nor natal; even if environmental misuse of programmes to breed people negating resistance (BS neutrality)
Partnering childfreely
- Creates value
- Builds performance (if anything in the world is valuable)
- Processes energy
- Wise flow of Qi imoprtant
- Excess attachments anyway
- While avoidance is understandable, anorexia is principally not good; gotta show up for natural energetics but wisely and lastingly
* Still ain't that different to natal just because children aint involved; energy-flow, age difference rationalizing, consuming, relational solvency, ..
Computing Consuming
In the world as it is, computers, phones, servers, and networks are not optional extras. They sit underneath work, housing, healthcare, transport, and even the ability to attend in-person groups. A person can try to stay “offline” in one area, yet still be carried by a web of machines running in the background: data-centres, routers, payment systems, electronic records, logistics.
Computing Consuming
In the world as it is, computers, phones, servers, and networks are not optional extras. They sit underneath work, housing, healthcare, transport, and even the ability to attend in-person groups. A person can try to stay “offline” in one area, yet still be carried by a web of machines running in the background: data-centres, routers, payment systems, electronic records, logistics.
In the world as it is, computers, phones, servers, and networks are not optional extras. They sit underneath work, housing, healthcare, transport, and even the ability to attend in-person groups. A person can try to stay “offline” in one area, yet still be carried by a web of machines running in the background: data-centres, routers, payment systems, electronic records, logistics.
A single device feels small. One laptop in a room, one phone in a pocket. But each screen is the front-end of a chain: mined materials, manufacturing, shipping, power grids, server halls, cooling systems, cables under oceans, and people maintaining all of it. Electricity runs through hardware that has to be produced, replaced, and eventually dumped somewhere. The computing layer is not free of cost, just because it looks weightless.
There is also the cost that moves through taxes. When a society leans heavily on complex digital infrastructure and large institutions, a lot of public money is drawn into keeping those structures alive: administration, buildings, systems, contracts, security, supervision, layers of management. Old wisdom has long noticed that when taxes are high and badly directed, some people starve. Today, the same pattern can be seen in a different form: heavy tax-consuming on large systems and complex infrastructures, while pressure on prices pushes down wages and squeezes those already close to the edge.
Servers and networks do not only live in the private sector. State systems, legal structures, policing, and armed forces lean on them too. That means that high consumption of computing resources and high tax-consuming can combine: more electricity, more hardware turnover, more staff-hours, more pressure to justify and expand the machinery. None of that is neutral. It shapes conditions that people have to live in, and it influences what is possible for those trying to recover and live more gently.
Someone in recovery can easily fall into two traps around this.
One trap is dismissal: “It’s just a device,” “It’s just a subscription,” “It’s just some background servers.” That attitude can slide into using tech as a quiet way to escape, over-occupy attention, or delay facing painful realities. The person tells themself the impact is negligible, while time, energy, electricity, and public and private resources get channeled into patterns that don’t heal anything.
The other trap is overload. Once the costs are noticed, it is easy to feel crushed by them. The person might start chasing a perfect operating system, the lowest-impact hardware, the purest setup. They keep reinstalling, switching platforms, reconfiguring, trying to carry the entire digital world on one conscience. That can turn into another loop: lots of activity, little recovery, and still no peace.
Between those extremes lies something more useable. Instead of asking, “Which choice is flawless?” a more helpful question might be, “Which direction does this choice move in, and what does it support?”
Some examples:
When choosing an operating system: does this system encourage constant upgrades, distractions, and heavy background activity, or does it tend to be quieter and more stable?
When choosing hardware: is this purchase likely to last for many years, or does it tie into a short replacement cycle?
When choosing hosting or services: does this pattern of use lean on huge platforms that constantly push more engagement, or on simpler tools that do the job without as much pull?
There is also the tension between physical presence and digital support. Meeting in person can look “simpler,” yet getting there may rely on transport systems, digital scheduling, card payments, GPS, and heating or lighting controlled by building systems. Avoiding all digital tools is usually not realistic, and in some cases it would actually increase the load: more travel, more time lost, less practical support, more strain on the person trying to recover.
The task is not to design an impossible life without electricity or networks, but to navigate what exists with more truth. For one person, that might mean choosing a stable, relatively light operating system and sticking with it for a good stretch, instead of jumping from one to another. For another, it might mean resisting the urge to turn every device into a source of constant stimulation. For another, it might mean accepting the need for certain tools to earn a living and stay out of deeper dependency on systems that have already caused harm.
Tax-consuming can be part of this inventory. When personal choices feed into patterns that demand ever more infrastructure, ever more management, ever more indirect costs, that has consequences down the line: less tax space for direct care and essentials, more pressure to cut wages or push prices, more justification for systems that keep people surveilled and controlled. None of this is a simple one-to-one equation, but it is also not harmless.
At the same time, taking on more guilt than truth requires does not help. No one person can repair the entire world of servers and budgets. What is possible is something more modest and more real: to stop pretending this area is costless; to notice when devices and systems are being used to avoid life rather than support it; to choose “good enough for now” tools that allow recovery work, income, and connection without deliberately feeding the heaviest forms of excess.
For someone inclined to stepwork or written inventory, questions might include:
In which ways is computing used as a support for healing and livelihood?
In which ways is it used mainly to escape, delay, or stir up more unrest?
Are there places where hardware is replaced or upgraded more out of restlessness than necessity?
Are there patterns of use that lean heavily on large, resource-hungry systems when lighter options would suffice?
Is there any area where tax-consuming or digital infrastructure is being leaned on, when a simpler, more direct path would actually fit better?
Most determinants cluster into three root flows:
1. **A. Freedom ↔ Oppression**
Most determinants cluster into three root flows:
1. **A. Freedom ↔ Oppression**
# Knowledge on the disease
# Extract
###### Most determinants cluster into three root flows:
1. **A. Freedom ↔ Oppression**
• Interference with autonomy (geo/finance/energetic)
• Denial-loops, pressure, demand-channeling misuse
• Sabotage patterns + cultural twists → tempo distortion
**B. Partnering ↔ Isolation**
• Deprivation blocking mutual presence
• Time-debt + structural constraints blocking decent partnering
• Cycles of being turned into victim or seeing self as victim
**C. Faith ↔ Distortion**
• Piety weaponized → deprivation seen as “virtue”
• Fasting/“purity” used to override needs
• Long-term correction of false narratives required for alignment
------
Note: I'm addicted to sacrificing, powerless and life unmanageable; all these messy situations etc. happens as a result, it sucks.
### **Disease Mechanics (Core Operating System of the Addiction Flow)**
**Roots (causes):**
• Early-life forced channeling (before 8)
• Sacrificing-addiction as inherited field
• Pre-life + cultural conditioning shaping loops
• Deprivation → intensified craving → knot formation
**Branches (behaviors):**
• Self-collapse → sub-malmströem → larger malmströem
• Attempts to fixate me in place for others’ gain
• Distortion of communication → excess detail required
• Latent despair pockets from oppression imprinting
**Meta-behaviors:**
• “Addictive deprivation” (forced anorexia logic)
• Sliding-back risk even when secure
• Punishes honesty, rewards silence
• Turns truthful insights into consumable “product”
------
###### **Oppressive-Dynamical layer**
• Near-of-kin rationalization → denial → emotive suppression
• Societal structures rewarding sacrifice and overconsumption
• Religious underearning → imbalance → deprivation
• Use of “goodness” to hide wrongs
• Being weakened/harmed by cultural or energetic override
• Attempts to cloak harm as piety, monasticizing, humility
• Impact by oppressivity during childhood, that veiled and negative unfoldings then used as precedence for more oppression
###### **Identity-Level Distortions**
• Being forced into roles
• Embedded energy-systems working through own hands, complicated to comprehend (misusing gap in awareness to manipulate identity)
• Pressure to abandon God for convenience
• Truth-speaking punished → insecurity escalates
• Compassion exploited → trust damaged
------
###### **Structural Binds**
• Financial leashes → dependency
• Control-method exposure → immobilization
• World-structures draining spiritual vitality
• Weaponized piety → deprivation escalation
• Societal denial → blocks removal of %-factors
• Merciless logic twists → pacifies/bends energy back unto & blinds
**Factors enabling relapse:**
• Excess, stuckness, life externally determined
• Blocked partnering + blocked wholesome financial path
• Untrue self-blame pushed as truth
• Denial-pollution in environment
• Compatibility collapse when craving intensifies
**How relapse-shapings take form:**
• Makes me “close my eyes and walk off a cliff”
• Effort capacity eroded
• Failure to complete cycles wholesomely
• Increased dependency on lesser evils
• Knot-like structural manifestations: Small vortexes (self-collapse) → large vortex (collective addiction)
• Roots nourish tree of addictivity, trunk-link deprivation-dynamics out of which grow branches of behaviors & patterns
###### Counteractive
- Capacity to self-correct despite sabotage.
- Recovery-skills protecting the timeline.
- Self-reparenting capacity → resilience.
- Ability to channel demand ethically.
- Moments of spiritual clarity that cut through distortion.
- 10th step + AI processing + actioning
- **Co-prosperity sphere accounting, requires vigilance.*
- Accountability-contexts
- Pruning = ongoing recovery & distancing
- Recognizing continual existence also pre-natal; %-part factors of shaping life and the way if manifested, I hold personal part in: Being part of how others end up %-part in addictively using through my life as a proxy of sorts, reinforcing the occurrence, needing fend off false blaming, attempts at stacking papers that aint mine on my desk, mal-narratives and bs instead of just saying it as it is, impossible accuracy-requirements, needing just continue on amidst the vilenesses →dislike of living + ends-drive → end things (relations, habits, consuming, binds, locational binds/dependencies and so on)
###### Impact-layers
**A. Time & Energy**
• Early recognition → preserved vitality
• Denial-loops distort pacing → corrected by awareness
**B. Skills & Money**
• Rebuilding divine understanding clarifies vocation
• Awareness of narrow path → better prioritization
**C. Relations**
• Detachment from FOO restores sovereignty
• Integrity stabilizes presence and prevents drift
**D. Strategic Reserves**
• Mapping distortions guards solvency
• Infrastructure must be clean of enabling flows
Partnering wisdom & boundaries
----------- NOTE - to be refined for recovery specifically: -------------
Partnering wisdom & boundaries
----------- NOTE - to be refined for recovery specifically: -------------
# Partnering wisdom & boundaries
----------- NOTE - to be refined for recovery specifically: -------------
*This is a process designed for my business-endeavor, which I asked AI to process into a recovery-format. Originally I was inspired by concepts of soul-mate and twinflame concepts, which over time grew to depth-awareness*
Recovery-Centered Inquiry: Settling energy • reducing waste • making space for real partnering
Anonymous
Are you still confusing value-comparison with compatibility?
Every day, your time, energy and capacity are spent on real tasks.
All of these seconds contribute to your ability to partner well—
to share time, intimacy, co-creation, and to make life easier by walking together.
When mismatches repeat for years, the energetic waste compounds.
A little awareness lowers that cost dramatically.
You are essential to any relationship you enter
Romance is meant to be mutually nourishing.
But if it gets used to soothe dependency, manage emptiness, or override needs,
it can leave you clinging, drained, or trying to control outcomes.
This harms everyone involved.
So the first inquiry becomes:
What do you require to be able to partner well?
Questions:
What do you tell yourself you “need” to exist, live, and thrive?
Which of these are true needs, and which are inherited expectations?
What do you require to maintain access to resources (money, time, stability)?
What is intolerable for you? What must continue, or the relationship will fail regardless?
What reliability already exists in your life that you must preserve?
What happens if you don’t?
This doesn’t just map “requirements.”
It reveals your true energetic costs—and what burdens you may unconsciously impose.
Compatibility as Energy Fit, Not Idealization
Every life shares surface similarities with many others—language, culture, habits, networks, histories.
But real compatibility is about the interaction of energetic patterns, like two substances reacting.
Some pairings feel neutral, some inconvenient, some deeply supportive.
Some are tempting but mutually diminishing.
Some feel desirable but collapse quickly, leaving a residue of attachment and slow decay.
Trial-and-error sounds harmless,
but the accumulated energetic losses can make later compatibility harder.
Another layer:
the closer the familiarity (family, cultural lineage, tight networks),
the more risk of entanglement, conflict, or long-term consequences.
Avoiding these complexities can itself create a dependency that destabilizes the bond.
Approach this superficially, and the outcomes will mirror that.
Approach it honestly, and the bond becomes simpler, calmer, and more sustainable.
Inquiry for Settling Energy and Manifesting Deep Connection
You may notice, as you move through this,
that some objects, habits, ideologies, obligations or living beings
pull heavily on your partnering-capacity.
The point is to notice these drains—not to blame, not to force change.
And definitely not to “remove obstacles” irresponsibly
(e.g. pets, dependents, duties).
If you took on a life, you care for it.
This inquiry helps you reduce waste,
settle scattered energy,
and gently widen the space in which deep romance can form.
1. Similarity
Some similarities make togetherness smoother.
Questions:
Which similarities feel essential for stability and calm?
Which similarities would be beneficial but not required?
2. Differences and Complementarity
Imagine you and a potential partner as two interacting elements.
Questions:
Which differences would complement you, creating a mutually beneficial reaction?
Which differences generate friction or diminish your capacity?
Can these risks be reduced, or are they baked into the dynamic?
3. Romantic Needs
By this point, the pool of viable partners becomes far smaller
—naturally, without judgment.
Age, life-stage, familiarity layers, personal histories,
and compatibility at the level of patterns
all refine the possibilities.
Within this refined group, requirements emerge.
Questions:
What needs appear across multiple hypothetical partnerships?
Which of these align with what you already require for your own well-being?
Which are easier for you to fulfill, and why?
Which become easier with learning or change—and at what personal cost?
Is that cost reasonable?
For those who enjoy the analytical angle:
What reduces or drains compatibility with lives already present around you?
4. Costs (Energy, Not Currency)
This part matters the most.
Every relationship has energetic costs:
your time, your attention, your responsibility, your emotional labor, your alignment.
Some costs are natural.
Some are wasteful.
Some quietly eat away at the relationship’s foundation.
Removing unnecessary waste increases compatibility without force.
Questions:
What are the realistic energy-costs of being in a relationship?
Which risks can you manage, and which consistently harm you?
Who may be unhappy or destabilized by the partnership—directly or indirectly?
Which relational patterns are sustainable “investments,”
and which collapse with even mild strain?
5. Investor-Relations (Contextual Impact)
Every connection benefits some surrounding contexts
—and inconveniences others.
Some people or systems benefit if you stay weak, overextended, or available.
Some benefit if you grow, stabilize, or form a strong partnership.
Some will unconsciously push for breakage;
others will support continuation if it aligns with their interests.
This isn’t about paranoia—
just realism about relational ecosystems.
Questions:
Who benefits from your stability, strength, and partnered life?
Who quietly loses access if you partner well?
Which alliances or contexts shift when you enter a bond?
6. Growth (Shared Yield)
Some relationships create more capacity than they consume.
Others drain both partners, even if there is love.
The key question is:
“What demand finds pathway through this partnership?”
Questions:
What forms of growth become possible?
(shared living, lowered strain, co-processing, emotional support,
intellectual expansion, energy regulation, ethical surplus)
What natural “stockholder” relations might emerge?
Which shifts in your life would this relationship naturally bring forth?
Are they desirable?
7. Basic Pre-emptives
You bring your history, your patterns, your wounds, your responsibilities.
So does the other person.
Ignoring this for “lust,” “symbolism,” “pressure,”
or political/financial agendas
creates harm that eats the foundation of the relationship.
Because you likely sit among the segment of the population
with relatively high influence or capital access,
your choices ripple far beyond your private life.
Be cautious.
Be ethical.
Be aware of impact.
Questions:
What struggles are likely to arise in a relationship with you?
How do you intend to approach them?
How can you avoid exploitative dynamics ahead of time?
How will you protect the bond from outside manipulation?
What practices do you use to settle energy and reduce waste?
8. Maximizing the Gain
This inquiry only works if you follow it with presence.
Questions:
Which shifts would lower complications and increase your partnering-capacity?
What worthwhile efforts appeared as you reflected?
Does the awareness you gained require any action today?
Is there something small you can do in the next 15 minutes
that gently increases the likelihood of meeting a compatible partner?
If you want, I can also:
keep this version but increase the metaphysical / qi-flow framing
make a minimalistic, monk-like version
adapt it into a lead magnet / pay-what-you-want Telegraph with low ask
add energy-settling micro-rituals between sections
Just tell me the direction.
**Primary Value Delivered**: *Freedom from destructive patterns + ability to pass that freedom on (keepin' it).*
Message carried that results in **real recovery**, not theoretical uplift.
**Primary Value Delivered**: *Freedom from destructive patterns + ability to pass that freedom on (keepin' it).*
Message carried that results in **real recovery**, not theoretical uplift.
# **Primary Value Delivered**: *Freedom from destructive patterns + ability to pass that freedom on (keepin' it).*
Message carried that results in **real recovery**, not theoretical uplift.
**Lower recovery-costs** so members can keep recovering without burning out.
**Programme integrity** (honesty, corruption-removal) so the message remains effective and safe.
**Traction** — giving newcomers a stable pathway into cleantime, fellowship, and depth-recovery.
**Reach** — making recovery findable, approachable, repeatable.
**Higher powering** — prayer, meditation, intention, sincerity that fuels sustainable recovery.
# **A Few Steps Produce Almost All the Value**
*While meetings and working the steps are required, noting that the steps are a set of principles that within the container produce the livable cleantime.*
1. **Consistent honesty + corruption-awareness**
2. **Natural marriagery approach**
3. **Depth-recovery first, surface benefits second**
4. **Meetings + stepwork + guided application**
5. **Communicative clarity + early tacticity**
6. **Structure that lowers recovery-costs**
7. **Higher powering with sincerity**
**High-Value Anchor**: **Honesty + awareness of corruptions → traction → message carried → recovery reproduced.**
*If Steps 1–5 aren’t lived honestly, flow clogs later (service, relationships, traction, prayer).*
**Extra-valuable Service**: Figuring out how to **elicit corruption-awareness subtly**, without triggering resistance or denial — finding ways to reach through layers of rationalization and inconvenience.
###### **Medium-Leverage Approaches**
- Wise partnering
- Accountability groups
- Fellowship unity-building
- Reach-enhancing pathways
- Ancestorizing / gratitude practices
###### **Low-Leverage Activities**
- Over-discussing God instead of living Love
- Multi-fellowship attendance without purpose
- Abstract theorizing not tied to stepwork
- Excess service that damages cleantime
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
###### **A. High-Waste Areas (Consistent Drains)**
- Over-extending in service (kills morale, blocks recovery).
- Staying in corrupt contexts without distance (neutralizes honesty).
- Rationalization loops (stall action).
- Interactions that don’t lead to traction or clarity.
- Activities not building cleantime or clarity.
###### **B. Conditional Waste**
- **Surface sales-points** (money, sex): good for newcomers only when depth exists.
- **Multi-fellowship hopping**: reach-positive but inventory-avoidant if misused.
- **Accountability groups**: helpful only when corruption-awareness is active.
###### **C. Major Friction Points**
- Dishonesty, superficial honesty or softened truth.
- Corruptions in meetings (labeling, oppression, sex-seeking, complacency).
- Unclear newcomer pathways → lost traction.
- Lack of financial stability → limits willingness & access.
- Messy communication → message doesn't land.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
# This builds on process-awareness
**Awareness of corruptions**: highly valuable; builds certainty, trust, autonomy, alignment, service capacity, traction, and strengthens prayer.
**Meetings require members**: once there's something to show up for, the pathway strengthens the message.
**Tacticity**: guiding hints ensure the message holds; accelerates recovery when built on depth.
**Depth-recovery**: distancing from corrupt contexts, building a life; supports networking, awareness, honesty.
**Natural marriagery**: eases morale, networking, accountability, financial potential, partnering.
**Building atop these are cleantime build-up, financial security, partnering, carrying the message**
[ MAJOR RECOVERY VALUE STEPS ]
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1) THE MESSAGE CARRIED
|
+-- Talking to Someone Outside the Meetings
| |
| +-- Personal recovery
| +-- Contact-pathway
| | +-- 2nd-step contact
| | +-- Pathway
| +-- Actively performing the 12th step
|
+-- Reinforcing the Programme
| |
| +-- Service
| | +-- Personal recovery
| | +-- Traditions
| +-- Avoiding over-extending (Traditions)
| +-- Autonomy (Traditions)
| +-- Eliminating corruptions
| +-- Psychiatric oppression
| +-- Dishonesty
| +-- In-rooms sex addictivity
|
+-- Generating Traction
| |
| +-- Service
| +-- Meetings
| +-- Personal recovery
| | +-- Depth
| | +-- Surface sales-points (money, sex, ..)
| | +-- Secured recovery (certainty, safety, trust)
| | +-- Post-mortem alignment
|
+-- Lowering Recovery-Costs / Consuming While Invested
| |
| +-- Individual Recovery
| | +-- Making the changes required
| | +-- Wise networking within programme
| | +-- Avoiding rationalization-risks
| |
| +-- Message-Carried Function
| +-- Traction
| +-- Certainty-buildup
| +-- Strong follow-up (meetings, depth-recovery)
| +-- Message carried onwards further
| +-- Programme integrity
| | +-- Honesty
| | +-- Eliminating corruptions
| +-- Service-structure unhindered
|
+-- Reach
| +-- Pathways findable
| +-- In-meeting reach
| +-- Multi-fellowship attendance
| +-- Wholesome disoppressive unity-generation
|
+-- Communicative Clarity
| |
| +-- Depth of recovery
| +-- Accustomization / recovery of communications
| +-- Alignment of applied communicatives
| | +-- Truth
| | +-- Carrying the message
| +-- Tacticity (early guiding hints)
| +-- Honesty
| +-- Awareness of corruptions
|
+-- Higher Powering
| |
| +-- Prayer
| | +-- Wisdom around prayer
| | +-- Purity (consumability)
| +-- Meditation
| | +-- Truth, honesty, message-carrying, programme-integrity
| +-- Ancestralizing
| +-- Self-application
| +-- Refusal of valuation
| +-- Gratitude
| +-- Format that works
|
+-- God
+-- "I don't know"
+-- Not misusing it, not allowing willingness to be twisted into:
- under-earning
- anorexia partnering-wise
- oppressive subjugation
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2) INDIVIDUAL RECOVERY
|
+-- Stepwork
| +-- Spiritual guide (sponsor, stepgroup)
|
+-- Meetings
| +-- Transport / internet
|
+-- Outreach
| +-- Phone
| +-- Parking lot
| +-- In-person contact
|
+-- Financial Security
| +-- Performance
| +-- Time
| +-- Money-in application
|
+-- Willingness / Morale
| +-- Partnering
| +-- Fellowship
| +-- Investedness
| +-- Service
|
+-- Decent Partnering (Childfreely)
| +-- Time
| +-- Performance
| +-- Natural marriagery
| +-- Commitment
|
+-- Accountability Groups
| +-- Fellowship
| +-- Internet / transport
|
+-- Service
| +-- Performance-capacity
| +-- Transport / internet
|
+-- Higher powering
+-- God
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
3) CLEANTIME BUILDUP
|
+-- Individual recovery
+-- Meetings
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
4) TRACTION TO WHOLESOME RECOVERY
|
+-- Wholesome unity
+-- Individual recovery
+-- Lowering recovery-costs
+-- Programme integrity
+-- Cleantime build-up
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
5) RECOVERY FOR LOVED ONES
|
+-- Recovery-presence
+-- Valuation of their efforts / non-harmful karma propagation
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
6) MEETING STRUCTURE
|
+-- Service
+-- Members
+-- Carrying the message
+-- 7th Tradition
+-- Financial security / money-in-to-member
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
7) UNLOCKING DECENCY RECOVERY-WISE
|
+-- Personal recovery
+-- Meetings
+-- Fellowship
+-- Valuation-wisdom
+-- Awareness
+-- Structure
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
8) UNVEILING / SHAPING AWARENESS (ANTI-DENIAL)
|
+-- Stepwork
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
9) DECENT RELATIONS (ONCE IN RECOVERY)
|
+-- Higher power
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
10) MITIGATION OF CORE ISSUES
|
+-- Oppression (labeling, drugging, oppressive explaining, complicity buildup)
+-- Sex addiction & deprivation of intimacy / partnering
+-- Underearning / complacency
+-- Lack of depth / honesty in inventory
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
11) GOD (MACRO-LAYER)
|
+-- Reducing conflict with the love of God for the incessantly sacrificed
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
12) HIGHER POWERING (MACRO-LAYER)
|
+-- Invite tributaries
+-- Interfacing
+-- Cleantime / abstinence buildup
+-- Willingness?